|
|
Advertising Lead-Aggregator on Pay-Per-Click and Search
|
| Competition is growing in Lead-Aggregator and it is more competitive than ever. Your potential customers now Google what they need, doing more research than ever. Are you successfully using Pay-Per-Click to stay ahead of your comeptition? |
|
Search Engine Marketing for Lead Aggregator: Your Customers ARE Searching Right Now
|
Potential customers in Lead-Aggregator are using search, whether you like it or not. You may have a reputation in the industry, but tens of thousands of peole turn to Pay-Per-Click advertising when searching for people to do business with related to Lead-Aggregator. |
|
Leveraging Pay-Per-Click to be Found on Page 1 is Critical
|
Studies have shown that 93% of people do not look past the first page of search results when they search on Google, Yahoo and MSN. If they do not find what they want, they simply do another search or give up completely. The engines allow advertisers to bid on Pay-Per-Click listings that feature them at the top of the listings. Being found on the second page will only get you 7% of searchers; page three sees only 1%. When they search, they are searching with something specific in mind. If they do not see those results, they will either conduct another search or will stop searching altogether. The listings that do appear on the first page will receive 93% of the clicks from the searchers. |
|
Pay-Per-Click Features You at the Top
|
| With hundreds of thousands - or even millions - of competing pages in search marketing you need to be at the top to be seen - at a minimum, on the first three pages. With PPC advertising you appear ahead of established and new competitors with ease.With Pay Per Click you only pay when people click on your listings. The display of your ad (also called an impression) is free. You bid against other advertisers and, in simple terms, the highest bidder gets rank first, the second highest is second, and so on (the actual ranking is based on a complex formula, but this demonstrates the general compcept). With PPC advertising, pay-per-click lets you decide which keywords to be found for and what message should be shown in the search engine. You only pay for the clicks and not for the impressions (the mere display of the listing). Comparing PPC clicks to a prequalification step, it quickly becomes apparent that these prequalified clicks are more valuable and can be extremely cost efficient. Remember - people who search and click are your best prospects - they are searching for what you offer. |
|
Pay Per Click Issues: Top Factors in PPC Campaigns
|
With more than 700,000 companies competing in pay-per-click adveritising how can you compete effectively? Most companies simply try it and test, often spending $5,000 to $500,000, managed by one person in their office who lacks the toolsets, knowledge and automation to truly maximize your advertising dollars. Successful pay per click requires expert management. Every click costs you money, and every click must be accountable. Unless you are tracking and optimizing on a real time basis, you are literally clicking money down the drain. Suppose we evaluated your campaign and found 40% waste (which is typical). On a $20,000 per month campaign, that's $96,000 wasted annually. That could be money in your pocket, or, if channeled back into search, could increase your revenue from good keywords by 66%! Keep in mind, pay per click management is a daunting task for companies that do-it-themselves or look to a general agency to manage their campaigns. Consider this: |
|
Is Managed Pay Per Click Right for Your Company?
|
If you are interested in learning more, please call us or complete the short form below. We will happily discuss your current campaign (if any) and see whether we can help you improve your results from pay per click. While you are here, we invite you to register to receive our newsletter. Its a great tool for clients, prospetive clients and do-it-yourself campaign managers who are looking for additional insight into search and industry trends. |
|
|
|
